Fireflies
Bot, silent desktop, mobile. Phone calls, WhatsApp, conference corridors, site visits.
How it works
Sachiv is not in the way of your conversations. Transcripts reach your CRM on their own, through a pass that already exists. Sachiv reads everything back, works out what it meant, and writes the part no integration can: typed facts, proof, and an honest answer to whether the work is finished.
Notetaker — yours already
Bot, silent desktop, mobile. Phone calls, WhatsApp, conference corridors, site visits.
Notes, natively, for whoever will not switch.
Forwarded to your Sachiv address, attachments and all.
goes straight to SachivCRM — where your team already works
Nobody on your team leaves this screen.
Sachiv — the qualifier
Every capture is on a record or in the queue. There is no third state where something quietly vanished.
The doorman places what metadata cannot: hallway audio, a nickname, one call covering three accounts.
Typed facts against your ontology. Constraints, commitments, preferences, each carrying the quote it came from.
Coverage with the gaps named, and an alarm the moment agreed terms are reopened.
Documents from the live record, internal lines stripped from the copy that leaves the building.
Your SaaS — onward
Typed facts and lifecycle signals pushed into the software your business actually runs on.
The walkthrough
Two of these belong to tools you already own. The other seven are the product.
Bots on video calls, a silent desktop recorder for the ones where a bot would be rude, mobile for in-person, hardware recorders for the field. Phone calls, WhatsApp, conference corridors. This layer already exists and Sachiv does not touch it.
The messy channels are exactly where relationship-business alpha lives, and they are the ones no AI-CRM covers.
Your existing toolsThe native pass moves a transcript onto the person it can match by attendee email, and cascades to their company by domain. It is free, it already works, and building our own version of it would be vanity.
Auto-creation stays switched off, deliberately. A CRM that invents records from every stray email address rots within a quarter. New counterparties enter through a reviewed proposal instead.
Your existing toolsSachiv asks the capture layer what exists and asks the record what landed. The difference is the work list. A conversation is either matched to a record or sitting in the queue; there is no third state where something quietly disappeared.
The system counts rather than waiting to be told. Counting proves completeness. Being told only proves it if you already trust that every message arrived, which is the thing you wanted proven.
SachivFor everything metadata could not place: an in-person recording with no attendees, a reference to "the battery guys", one call covering three accounts, a counterparty who has never appeared before. Candidates come from the registry by name, domain, alias and semantic similarity, then a model adjudicates with the relevant span of conversation for each candidate.
Three outcomes: file it, propose it as a new client, or send it to a review lane inside the CRM with the two or three quotes that drove the call. A human resolves it with a dropdown, and that answer becomes a label the system learns from.
SachivNot a summary. Facts, classified against an ontology built for your business: contractual constraints, requirement metrics, commitments made by each side, preferences, risk flags, evidence of milestones. Alongside the general classes sit the structured keys your industry actually turns on.
Every fact carries the sentence it came from and a link to the moment it was said. A fact without a quote is not written. That rule is what makes the record defensible rather than merely convenient.
SachivA new fact collides with an existing one on the same key. If it clearly revises it, the old version is superseded and kept in history. If it is genuinely ambiguous, both are marked disputed and queued for a human rather than silently overwritten.
The alternative — last write wins — is how systems quietly start lying to the people who trust them.
SachivOnboarding complete, close complete: expressed as rules over the accumulated facts. An intro interaction exists, at least one contractual constraint captured, the reference document received, terms shared, the agreement attested. Continuously re-evaluated as the facts move.
Output is a stage, a coverage percentage, and the missing items by name. Plus three signals: complete, stalled, and reopened. The third one — a new statement contradicting something already satisfied — is the one that pays for the system by itself.
SachivA counterparty one-pager, a risk summary, whatever your business sends. Generated from the current fact set with every line cited, emailed, and attached back onto the record.
Facts are marked internal or external, and the external copy provably contains none of the former. If someone later edits a fact the document was built on, the document flags that its basis changed.
SachivEverything qualified passes through one place, so it can also leave. Per-tenant webhooks and a small read API carry typed facts, coverage changes and lifecycle signals into your own product, mapped to the fields it actually needs.
This is what makes onboarding invisible. An account provisions itself out of what was said on the calls, so the client never meets a form, and a genuinely complex B2B setup completes without anyone being asked to do data entry.
SachivWhere truth sits
Sachiv is deliberately the smallest piece of this system. If it went away tomorrow, your recordings, your records and your mail would all still be exactly where they are.
Audio and canonical transcripts stay in your capture workspace. Sachiv never becomes the place your recordings live.
People, companies, interactions, facts and coverage live in your CRM. You own your record, in tools that outlive the engagement.
Forwarded client mail stays in the mailbox it was sent to, durable and searchable. Sachiv keeps what it derived, not a second copy of your inbox.
Only configuration, cursors and an append-only receipts log sit with Sachiv. Small enough to walk away from, complete enough to audit.
Roadmap
Every vendor added charges twice: once in money and once as another party in the data path. So the list below is short on purpose, and nothing in the second half gets built until the thing that would justify it actually happens.
Nine capabilities, each with an acceptance criterion that can be failed. Evaluation comes before interface throughout.
Push gets added beside the reconciliation loop as an accelerator, never as a replacement. The count remains the guarantee.
A record-page widget for the coverage meter and facts panel, with accept and re-file as record actions.
The driver seam is defined now and the second implementation written only when a real client requires it. Email arrives with content there, so the mailbox mostly goes away, and identity resolution works harder.
Chat platforms, SMS, and the messaging apps where deal flow actually lives. Built the afternoon somebody needs one.
A managed provider takes on the verification burden. Until then, forwarding wins on cost, simplicity and compliance surface.
Describe qualification criteria in prose, edit schemas and behaviours by conversation, and register your own downstream webhooks. Forms first, because the forms define the schema the conversation will write into.
What are counterparties in this market consistently asking for? In opaque, siloed industries, the aggregate is worth more than any single dossier.
Onboarding, as a by-product of talking. Installed on the tools your team already pays for, tuned to the constraints your business actually runs on, and wired into the product your clients think they onboarded themselves into.